MIXED-USE PROPERTY CASE STUDY
Owner-Occupied Heritage Office/Residence
An 1880s double-brick heritage building in regional Victoria used as both a professional office and a residence. The owner came to us uninsured after 3 declines.
THE SITUATION
An owner-occupier in regional Victoria came to us without any insurance in place. Their property was an 1880s double-brick heritage building that they used as both a professional office and their residence.
Three insurers had declined. The combination of heritage construction, mixed commercial/residential use, and the regional location had put it outside standard insurer appetite. Home insurers wouldn't cover it because of the office use, and commercial insurers weren't interested in the residential component.
The owner needed building cover, public liability for clients visiting the office, and contents cover for both business equipment and personal belongings.
OUR APPROACH
Owner-occupied mixed-use buildings are a specific niche. They don't fit cleanly into either a home insurance or a commercial property policy. We needed to find a solution that covered both uses under one programme.
- Dual-use presentation: We structured the submission to clearly show the office and residential components, including the percentage split and how the spaces were used
- Heritage documentation: We provided details on the 1880s double-brick construction, including any heritage listing details and the building's structural condition
- Combined programme: Rather than trying to split the risk across multiple policies, we sought a single programme covering building, liability, and contents
THE CHALLENGES
The 1880s construction is the oldest building we placed in this batch of mixed-use cases. Heritage double-brick is actually a robust construction type, but the age alone triggers automatic declines from many insurers' systems.
Regional Victoria adds distance from emergency services and fire response, which some underwriters factor into their risk assessment. The professional office use, while low-risk, was enough to push the property outside standard home insurance criteria.
THE OUTCOME
We placed a complete programme at around $3,000 annual premium, covering building, public liability, and contents for both the office and residential portions.
The owner went from being completely uninsured to having comprehensive cover for their mixed-use property - building, public liability, and contents all included.
At around $3,000 for a full programme on an 1880s heritage building, this represents excellent value. The key was finding an underwriter who could look at the actual risk - a well-maintained double-brick building with a low-risk professional office - rather than just the age and mixed-use classification.
More Case Studies
All case studiesHeritage Mixed-Use with Hospitality Tenancy
1920s heritage building with cafe and residential tenants. Came to us uninsured after 8 declines.
Read case study Mixed-Use PropertyLaw Office and Residence, Refinanced in Two Days, NSW South Coast
1980s building, law office at the front and residence at the rear, uninsured mid-refinance. 5 declines. Quotes from ~$2,400 to ~$12,700. Placed at ~$2,400 in two days.
Read case study Mixed-Use PropertyMixed-Use with Medical Tenancy
1910s double-brick building with allied health practice and residential units. Non-renewed by previous insurer.
Read case studyUse your property for both work and living?
Owner-occupied mixed-use buildings need specialist cover. Standard home insurance won't cut it, and most commercial policies don't cover the residential component.