ACCOUNTANT PI CASE STUDY

Accounting Practice PI and Cyber Cover Placed Together

The client needed Professional Indemnity for core accounting work and Cyber cover for the privacy and data exposure that sits beside it. We compared multiple PI markets, then linked the Cyber placement so the programme worked as a whole.

$2M PI Limit Sought
9 PI Markets Compared
Cyber Linked Placement
Data Client Privacy Exposure
01

THE SITUATION

An Australian accounting practice came to Tank Insurance needing Professional Indemnity insurance for accountants. The firm handled tax compliance, BAS preparation, bookkeeping and ASIC compliance, with some offshore bookkeeping and accounting support reviewed locally in Australia.

The requested PI limit was $2 million. That limit needed to reflect the professional advice exposure, the client financial data being handled, and the firm's obligations as an accounting practice.

During the placement, a linked Cyber insurance need was identified. That mattered because PI and Cyber respond to different parts of an accounting firm's risk. PI is built around professional advice and service errors. Cyber is built around data, privacy, business interruption and cyber incident response.

02

OUR APPROACH

We treated the placement as a combined professional risk programme rather than a single-policy quote exercise.

For the PI component, we compared multiple insurers with accountant appetite, including mainstream professional indemnity markets and specialist underwriting agencies. The submission needed to make the actual work clear: tax compliance, BAS, bookkeeping, ASIC compliance and offshore support that was reviewed in Australia.

For the Cyber component, we separated the data and privacy exposure from the advice exposure. Accounting firms often hold sensitive client financial information, tax records and identity details. A cyber incident may not be a professional advice error, but it can still create serious cost, notification and disruption issues.

03

THE CHALLENGE

The challenge was not simply finding a PI quote. The challenge was making sure the insurance programme reflected how the practice actually operated.

Accounting firms can look straightforward from the outside, but underwriting can change once the insurer sees the service mix, offshore support, professional body requirements, client financial data and cyber exposure. A cheap PI quote alone does not necessarily solve the full risk.

The important broker step was identifying where PI stopped and Cyber needed to start, then making sure both placements were considered together.

04

THE OUTCOME

We arranged the Professional Indemnity placement after comparing a broad panel of insurer options, then linked the Cyber placement so the firm had a clearer insurance structure around both advice risk and data risk.

The result was a more complete programme for the accounting practice: PI for the professional services exposure, and Cyber for the client data and incident response exposure that sits alongside it.

This is a useful example for accounting practices that assume PI alone is enough. For firms handling tax, BAS, bookkeeping and client financial records, Cyber insurance is often a separate conversation worth having at the same time as PI.

Need PI and Cyber reviewed together?

If your accounting practice handles tax, BAS, bookkeeping, ASIC compliance or client financial records, we can help review where Professional Indemnity stops and Cyber cover should start.

Expert Review: 31/05/2026

Verified by Tank Insurance Brokers

Call Us Now +61 2 9000 1155