BOOKKEEPER PI CASE STUDY
Solo Bookkeeper, New Business
A sole-operator bookkeeper with less than $100,000 in revenue setting up their first practice needed $2M PI plus $20M Public Liability. We sourced a combined package that beat the competing quote, then re-placed at renewal as the business evolved.
THE SITUATION
A sole-operator bookkeeper in metropolitan NSW was establishing their first practice. With less than $100,000 in annual revenue and no staff, they needed $2M in Professional Indemnity cover alongside $20M Public Liability to satisfy client contract requirements.
The client had already received a competing quote from another provider totalling roughly $1,000 for PI and PL combined, and wanted to know if they could do better.
OUR APPROACH
We went to market across six insurers to obtain standalone PI quotes at $2M, as well as combined PI and PL package options. This gave us a clear picture of where the market sat for this risk profile.
Standalone PI quotes at $2M ranged from around $435 to over $1,000 for the same risk, demonstrating exactly why comparing the market matters. We also obtained combined PI and PL packages to assess whether bundling offered better value than purchasing each policy separately.
THE PLACEMENT
We sourced a combined PI and PL package at around $950, beating the client's competing quote. We also applied a stamp duty exemption that the previous provider hadn't factored in, reducing the total cost further. Stamp duty exemptions aren't applied automatically and are something brokers need to identify and action.
Within the first year, the client added BAS services to their practice. We processed a mid-term endorsement to reflect the expanded scope, with no significant change to the premium.
THE OUTCOME
By renewal, the practice had evolved significantly. The business was now roughly 30% bookkeeping and 70% tax agent work. We went back to market with the updated risk profile and re-placed the policy with a different insurer at around $675.
Combined premium of roughly $950 in year one dropped to around $675 at renewal, a reduction of approximately 28%, while the scope of cover actually increased to reflect the broader service offering.
This case highlights a common pattern we see with bookkeeping startups: the practice evolves, services expand, and the insurance needs to move with it. Having a broker who re-markets at renewal, rather than auto-renewing, can make a meaningful difference.
Put this placement in context
More Case Studies
All case studiesBookkeeper & Tax Agent Startup
Budget-conscious startup compared PI quotes across five insurers and multiple limit options
Read case study Professional IndemnitySole Trader Draftsperson, New Business
New sole trader civil draftsperson placed after 3 insurer declines. Renewal market comparison revealed a 3.3x price spread across five insurers.
Read case study Professional IndemnityMultidisciplinary Engineering Consultant, Renewable and Overseas Exposure
PI and PL placed for a multidisciplinary engineering consultant after several markets referred or declined over renewable energy and overseas exposure.
Read case studyNeed PI cover for your bookkeeping practice?
Whether you're just starting out or your practice has evolved, we can help source PI cover that fits your current services and budget. Also offering Tax Agent PI and Accountant PI insurance.