These are real claim scenarios we see on mixed-use properties. Each shows how the policy typically responds - useful for understanding where cover starts and stops in practice.
These scenarios reflect standard mixed-use wording responses. Individual policy terms vary and should be checked at the schedule level.
Scenario 1 - Ground floor cafe fire spreads to apartments above
A cooking fire in the cafe's commercial kitchen spreads, damaging the cafe's fit-out and the structural floor above, with smoke damage to the residential apartments. A standard mixed-use policy typically responds as follows:
- Building structural damage - typically covered up to the sum insured (subject to policy terms)
- Smoke damage to the structure of the apartments - typically covered
- Cafe's fit-out and equipment - not covered under the building policy (cafe tenant's own business insurance applies)
- Apartment tenants' contents - not covered under the building policy (tenant's own renter's insurance applies)
- Loss of rent on apartments and cafe while building is repaired - typically covered
- Public liability if an apartment tenant was injured escaping the smoke - typically covered, subject to the policy PL section
Scenario 2 - Burst pipe in upstairs apartment floods retail below
A plumbing failure in an upstairs apartment causes water to flood the retail tenancy below. Typical mixed-use policy response:
- Building structural damage (damaged ceiling, walls, floors) - typically covered
- Retail tenant's stock and equipment - not covered under the building policy (tenant's own contents / BI policy)
- Retail tenant's loss of income - not covered under the owner's policy (tenant's own BI, or a claim against the owner if negligence is proven)
- Owner's loss of rent while retail is unusable - typically covered
- If the retail tenant sues the owner for inadequate plumbing maintenance, public liability may respond - depends on the specifics of the claim and the policy
Scenario 3 - Visitor slips on wet floor in shared entry
A customer of the ground-floor cafe slips on wet tiles in the shared entry to the building. They sue for injury. Typical policy response:
- The shared entry is owner-controlled, so the owner's public liability section typically responds
- Covers legal defence costs and any damages payable, subject to the policy PL limit
- If the slip happened inside the cafe itself, the cafe's own PL would typically apply instead
- Most mixed-use policies carry a $10M or $20M PL limit which is usually sufficient for typical slip-and-fall claims, but every claim is assessed on its facts
Scenario 4 - Storm damages shopfront glass and signage
A severe storm shatters the shopfront glass, damages the illuminated signage and causes water ingress into the commercial tenancy. Typical policy response:
- Building structural damage (roof, walls) - typically covered under storm
- Shopfront glass - typically covered up to the glass sub-limit (check your schedule)
- Signage - typically covered up to the signage sub-limit (often separate from glass)
- Water damage to the structure - typically covered under storm
- Water damage to the tenant's stock - tenant's own policy, not the building policy
- Owner's loss of rent during repair period - typically covered
These scenario responses are general illustrations based on standard market wordings. Your specific policy schedule and PDS will determine how a real claim is handled.