CASE STUDY - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PI
Five Business Pack Declines. One Occupation Label.
A NATA-accredited geotechnical firm couldn't get basic contents and business interruption cover from five of the insurers we approached. The occupation code was enough for all of them to decline.
THE SITUATION
A NATA-accredited geotechnical firm based in New South Wales approached us for a full insurance programme. The business operated a laboratory and field testing operation, specialising in pre-construction geotechnical work for large commercial building sites, aged care facilities, and industrial developments.
They needed three policies: Professional Indemnity, Public Liability, and a business pack covering contents, glass, and business interruption. With an existing PI arrangement through another insurer approaching renewal, the client was looking for a competitive alternative and a broker who understood the geotechnical sector.
The scope of work was predominantly commercial and industrial - not high-rise residential. That distinction would turn out to be critical in the PI placement.
OUR APPROACH
We took the PI to market across several specialist underwriters active in the geotechnical space. The key insurers approached included Ocean Underwriting, About Underwriting, and the client's incumbent insurer who was running a competing quote to the end.
For the business pack, we approached a broader panel including major insurers typically comfortable with commercial occupations.
Each submission included details of the NATA accreditation, the commercial and industrial project focus, revenue profile, and the specific mix of laboratory and field investigation work.
THE CHALLENGE
The PI market was competitive but came with a specific condition. The best-priced insurer was comfortable covering geotechnical work on commercial and industrial sites, but imposed a restriction: high-rise exposure (buildings of ten or more floors) had to stay below 20% of the book. The client confirmed that virtually all of their work was on industrial and commercial sites, not high-rise, so this wasn't a practical limitation.
The real story, though, was the business pack. Five of the six insurers we approached declined a standard business pack for a geotechnical firm. Not on claims history, not on revenue, not on location - purely on the occupation classification. A NATA-accredited laboratory operation with a clean record couldn't get basic contents and business interruption cover from five of the insurers we approached.
This is the kind of gap that surprises business owners. You can run a fully accredited, well-managed operation and still find that much of the mainstream market won't quote you on a straightforward business pack because of how your occupation is coded.
THE OUTCOME
We placed the full suite:
- Professional Indemnity: placed at around $27,000 total cost, beating both the incumbent insurer's pricing and the next-best alternative by several thousand dollars. We reduced our own broker fee to help close the gap.
- Business Pack: placed at around $1,000 with the insurer that would quote it. Five of the insurers we approached declined on occupation alone.
The business pack outcome is the standout. A legitimate, NATA-accredited geotechnical firm with a clean record couldn't get contents and business interruption cover from five of the insurers we approached. Without a broker working specialist channels, this business would have gone uninsured on a basic commercial policy.
The PI placement also demonstrated the value of market access. The winning insurer's high-rise threshold condition was a non-issue for this client's work profile, and the pricing undercut the incumbent - proving that even clients with existing arrangements benefit from a competitive broking process.
Put this placement in context
More Case Studies
All case studiesPetroleum Engineer: Six Declines, International Operations
Petroleum engineering consultancy with 100% international operations declined by six insurers on occupation alone. Placed through a specialist underwriter - the market that ultimately provided terms.
Read case study Professional IndemnityFire Protection Consultancy PI: What the Market Covers and What It Doesn't
A NSW fire protection consultancy needed $1M PI for their advisory work. Three insurers declined on occupation. Competitive terms obtained through Woodina.
Read case study Professional IndemnityEngineering Geologist: Policy Wording Gaps Exposed
Sole-trader engineering geologist compared three PI wordings. Cheapest excluded pre-purchase reports and building certificates - core weekly services. Only one policy matched the actual scope.
Read case studyGeotechnical PI: Cover for High-Risk Projects & Tenders
Don't let compliance or complexity slow you down. Contact Tank Insurance to secure the limits and policy wording needed for your geotechnical practice.