CASE STUDY - PETROLEUM ENGINEER PI

Six Declines. One Market. International Operations.

A petroleum engineering consultancy operating exclusively overseas was declined by multiple insurers without any review of revenue, claims history, or project complexity. The occupation and geography were enough. We found the one underwriter willing to engage.

6 Insurer Declines
100% International Operations
$2M PI Limit
1 Market Willing to Quote
01

THE SITUATION

A petroleum engineering consultancy came to us for Professional Indemnity cover. The business provided oil and gas pipeline consultancy, advice on extraction processes, and staff training - delivered entirely to clients overseas. There was no Australian project work.

The operations spanned several countries across the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South America. Each region brought its own complications for underwriters, both in terms of legal exposure and country risk.

On paper, a modest-sized consultancy. In practice, the occupation profile and geographic footprint put it well outside what most Australian PI markets will accept.

02

OUR APPROACH

We took the risk to market across the specialist PI panel - underwriters who write engineering professional indemnity and engage with occupations outside the standard consulting categories.

Six insurers reviewed the submission. All six declined on occupation grounds. None requested further information on revenue, claims history, or project complexity - the occupation type and international exposure were sufficient for each to exit without further engagement.

One specialist underwriter, focused on hard-to-place professional risks, was willing to engage and provided the only terms available in the market.

03

THE CHALLENGE

Petroleum engineering advice on active oil and gas operations sits in a different risk category to most professional consulting work. When a consultant advises on extraction processes or trains staff working on live hydrocarbon infrastructure, the causation line between that advice and a potential incident is short and direct. Most PI underwriters aren't comfortable writing that exposure.

The international footprint made it harder again. Operations across politically complex and operationally active regions carry elevated risk that domestic insurers price heavily - or decline outright. The combination of the occupation and the geography created a profile that most of the standard market won't touch, regardless of the consultant's experience or claims history.

The training component adds a separate layer. If something goes wrong following advice or training delivered on live operations, the professional liability path leads straight back to the consultant's PI policy. That's exactly the kind of exposure many underwriters would rather leave uninsured than write.

04

THE OUTCOME

We placed PI cover through a specialist underwriting agency focused on hard-to-place professional risks - the sole market willing to quote after six declines.

  • Limit: $2 million PI
  • Coverage: worldwide professional services across all operating jurisdictions
  • Premium: around $5,300 gross (including broker fee)

The premium reflects the specialist rate for an occupation where six of seven underwriters reviewed the risk and declined on sight. For petroleum engineers operating internationally, the Australian market effectively has one door - and finding it requires a broker with direct access to specialist underwriters who genuinely engage with this risk profile.

If you're a petroleum engineering consultant with international operations and have been declined elsewhere, the mainstream market is unlikely to change its position. The path to cover is through specialist channels, and that's where we operate.

Call Us Now +61 2 9000 1155