CASE STUDY - SAFETY INSTALLATION PUBLIC LIABILITY

Nine Markets. One Placement. Renewed.

A sole trader installing edge protection and perimeter rail on residential builds needed $20M Public Liability. The business name read like a consulting firm. The actual work was physical, at height, on residential sites. Most of the market declined on occupation or turnover before placement was secured.

9 Markets Approached
$20M PL Limit
Placed Full Programme
Year 2 Renewed
01

THE SITUATION

A sole trader based in Western Sydney came to us needing Public Liability insurance for their edge protection and perimeter rail installation business. The work was physical: installing fall-arrest systems, perimeter rail, and edge protection on residential homes during construction.

The business was early stage - revenue under $100,000, one employee, no prior insurance history. The requested limit was $20M Public Liability, standard for contractors working on residential builds where head contractor requirements apply.

What complicated the picture was the business name. On paper, it read like a WHS consulting or safety advisory firm. In reality, the work was hands-on trade work at height on residential sites - a materially different risk class from professional advice, and one that sits in a specific part of the insurer market.

02

OUR APPROACH

We took the risk to the Public Liability market across nine underwriters and specialist platforms, providing full details of the operation: physical installation only, residential buildings, edge protection and perimeter rail systems, sole trader with one employee, Western Sydney base.

The occupation description was a key part of our submission. A business name with "safety" in it will cause many underwriters to categorise the risk as professional advice rather than physical trades work. We made sure each submission led clearly with the actual activity and the relevant work at height exposure.

Most markets declined or were unable to provide workable terms. High Street Underwriting was the market that came through - they reviewed the submission and provided terms.

03

THE CHALLENGE

Two challenges defined this placement.

Occupation description vs actual activity. A business name with "safety" in it reads as consulting or advisory work to an underwriter scanning a submission. Physical edge protection installation is a trades risk - working at height, managing perimeter systems on residential sites under construction, with the exposures typical of the building trades. Getting that distinction clear in the submission was essential. Even so, most of the market declined outright.

Minimum turnover thresholds. Some insurers operate minimum viable turnover requirements. An early-stage sole trader with revenue under $100,000 can sit below those floors regardless of how clean and legitimate the operation is. The decline isn't about risk quality - it's about where the business sits against the insurer's book criteria. The broker market exists in part to identify insurers whose appetite doesn't exclude operators at this stage of their business.

04

THE OUTCOME

High Street Underwriting provided terms after most other markets declined or were unable to quote. The policy was placed at around $3,700, with a total cost to the client of around $4,100 including our fee. The policy renewed into a second year with the same insurer.

  • Limit: $20M Public Liability
  • Premium: around $3,700 (total cost to client around $4,100)
  • Renewed: continued into a second year with the placing insurer

We placed Public Liability cover for a sole trader edge protection installer after going to nine markets. The placement demonstrates why the accessible insurer panel matters for physical safety installation work - particularly for early-stage businesses where turnover and occupation categorisation combine to narrow the available market significantly.

For safety installation businesses - edge protection, perimeter rail, scaffolding, and related trades - the path to cover is narrower than the occupation might suggest. Specialist underwriters with appetite for construction trades at height are typically the only viable route. Standard platforms and general liability markets aren't built for this occupational class.

This is a Public Liability placement, not PI. If your safety work is advisory - risk assessments, WHS consulting, HAZOP studies - Professional Indemnity insurance is the relevant cover, and the market dynamics are different again.

Call Us Now +61 2 9000 1155