CASE STUDY - CIVIL ENGINEER PI

Four Insurers. Seven Times the Price Difference.

A Gold Coast civil engineering consultancy went to market for $2M PI. The cheapest quote was $1,500. The most expensive was $11,000. Same cover. Same risk.

$2M PI Limit
4 Insurers Quoted
7x Price Spread
QLD Gold Coast
01

THE SITUATION

A civil engineering consultancy based on the Gold Coast approached us for Professional Indemnity insurance. The director ran a small advisory practice focused on technical consultancy for government and transport infrastructure projects: roads, drainage, and site development input at the planning and design stage.

The practice was early-stage, with annual revenue under $100,000. PI coverage of $2M was requested, consistent with typical requirements for civil engineering work. Importantly, the firm was non-certifying, providing technical advice and design input only, not issuing compliance certificates or formally signing off on construction work.

That distinction matters. Civil engineers who issue certification carry greater direct liability exposure. Consultants who provide advisory and design input to government projects sit at a lower risk profile for most underwriters, but not all of them price it that way.

02

OUR APPROACH

We took the risk to market across four underwriters active in the professional indemnity space for engineering consultancies:

  • ProRisk - specialist professional lines underwriter
  • Dual Australia - professional indemnity specialist
  • Vero - general insurer with PI capability
  • BHSI (Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance) - global specialty carrier

Each was provided with identical information about the risk: civil engineering consultancy, non-certification scope, government and transport sector focus, $10K revenue, $2M limit requested, Gold Coast location.

We requested annual premium quotes, assessed policy terms, and compared wording to ensure each quote was covering the same scope before presenting options to the client.

03

THE CHALLENGE

The striking challenge here wasn't difficulty placing the risk. Civil engineering consulting is placeable across the market. The challenge was the extraordinary price dispersion that came back.

ProRisk quoted around $1,500. BHSI quoted around $11,000. That's a 7x difference in annual premium for identical cover on the same risk. Dual and Vero fell in between, at roughly $2,200 and $8,800 respectively.

The spread reflects how differently underwriters price the non-certification distinction, the government/transport sector mix, and the early-stage revenue profile. Some insurers apply a minimum base rate regardless of revenue or scope. Others price more granularly to the actual risk characteristics.

For a business at $10K annual revenue, the difference between $1,500 and $11,000 in annual PI premium is the difference between insurance being affordable and being a serious operational burden.

04

THE OUTCOME

We obtained competitive terms from four underwriters, with the full quote range clearly presented. The lowest credible option came from ProRisk, a specialist professional lines underwriter with strong civil engineering appetite, at around $1,500 total cost.

Four quotes returned for identical $2M PI cover. Price range: $1,500 to $11,000. The 7x spread illustrates exactly why going to a single insurer or an online aggregator leaves civil engineering consultants significantly exposed to overpaying.

For a civil engineering consultancy at this stage of practice, the difference between $1,500 and $11,000 in annual PI premium is material. The ProRisk terms represented strong value for the risk profile, and the full quote range gave a clear picture of where the market sat on this type of work.

If you're a civil engineering consultant comparing PI quotes, this is exactly the kind of market visibility a broker process provides. Multiple specialist underwriters, identical information, very different answers.

Call Us Now +61 2 9000 1155